Longevity and new research

This topic reads large studies on health and lifespan and says what they found, how strong the evidence is, and what they do not show. Many longevity findings come from observational studies, so we say when a link is not proof of cause.

Longevity is full of loud promises: pills that "reverse aging", tests that read your "biological age", protocols that claim to add decades. The evidence behind most of them is thin. The habits with the strongest data are less exciting: moving more, keeping muscle, and treating disease that is already there.

How many steps a day are linked to a longer life reads a meta-analysis of 15 cohorts and 47,471 adults, including why 10,000 is not a magic number. Strength training and longevity covers how much weekly strength work was linked with the biggest difference, and why more was not better. Semaglutide and the heart explains the SELECT trial: who it studied, what "20% lower" means in absolute numbers, and what it does not tell you. These are explanations of research, not medical advice.